Hello Folks
I'm just wondering whether I'm being too fussy, or if there's an issue that needs to be resolved.
My SL rear ride height is higher on the drivers side, consistently, by 10mm. The front of the car is equal height, to within a few mm. The overall height fluctuates depending on whether the car's running, or stopped etc, but as I understand it that's normal - it's the rear end difference that bothers me.
The car's recently had a new tandem pump, and just had a new front right strut, and when MB changed the strut I pointed out the ride height difference. My missus picked the car up and they told her they'd changed the strut and ABC fluid, and then did a rodeo test, but when I checked the car last night it's still 10mm higher...
Is 10mm acceptable? I just read on the other US forum that MB consider less than 1/2" acceptable. 10mm is < 1/2", so am I barking up the wrong tree?
I'm just wondering whether I'm being too fussy, or if there's an issue that needs to be resolved.
My SL rear ride height is higher on the drivers side, consistently, by 10mm. The front of the car is equal height, to within a few mm. The overall height fluctuates depending on whether the car's running, or stopped etc, but as I understand it that's normal - it's the rear end difference that bothers me.
The car's recently had a new tandem pump, and just had a new front right strut, and when MB changed the strut I pointed out the ride height difference. My missus picked the car up and they told her they'd changed the strut and ABC fluid, and then did a rodeo test, but when I checked the car last night it's still 10mm higher...
Is 10mm acceptable? I just read on the other US forum that MB consider less than 1/2" acceptable. 10mm is < 1/2", so am I barking up the wrong tree?